The Foundational Docs offered also look plausible. Dont worry: you are not expected to have any outside knowledge of the non-required case. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/shaw-v-reno-4768502. Match. Looks like we all should have shown it (or parts of it). You are responsible for implementing sufficient procedures and checkpoints to satisfy your particular requirements for anti-virus protection and accuracy of data input and output, and for maintaining a means external to our site for any reconstruction of any lost data. For the SCOTUS comparison, I committed a major classroom crime. YOU WAIVE AND HOLD HARMLESS THE COMPANY AND ITS AFFILIATES, LICENSEES, AND SERVICE PROVIDERS FROM ANY CLAIMS RESULTING FROM ANY ACTION TAKEN BY ANY OF THE FOREGOING PARTIES DURING, OR TAKEN AS A CONSEQUENCE OF, INVESTIGATIONS BY EITHER SUCH PARTIES OR LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES. YOU ALSO GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION OR OTHER CLASS PROCEEDING. Dont know about you folks, but FRQ style #4 has had me rattled since they came out with it. Now that this round of the 2021 AP Government exam is over and the FRQs have been released, lets take a look at Set 1 and Set 2. Dissents from Justices Blackmun and Stevens echoed Justice White. In reading it again, the prompt asks for the structural barrier, and if theres only one here, its voter registration. These Terms of Use are an integral part of the Website Terms of Use that apply generally to the use of our Website. Terms and Conditions We agree. Shaw v. Reno, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases] Heimler's History 446K subscribers Subscribe 1.7K 107K views 1 year ago AP Government Unit 2 Review GET FOLLOW-ALONG. Reno SCOTUS FRQ 1. Create three research questions that would be appropriate for a historical analysis essay, keeping in mind the characteristics of a critical r, Wong s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing 11th Edition Hockenberry Rodgers Wilson Test Bank, Leadership class , week 3 executive summary, I am doing my essay on the Ted Talk titaled How One Photo Captured a Humanitie Crisis https, School-Plan - School Plan of San Juan Integrated School, SEC-502-RS-Dispositions Self-Assessment Survey T3 (1), Techniques DE Separation ET Analyse EN Biochimi 1. To transmit, or procure the sending of, any advertising or promotional material, including any "junk mail", "chain letter", "spam", or any other similar solicitation. The decision in this case provides clear instructions for redistricting and, districts with bizarre lines or loose shapes are likely in violation of the Constitution and, the following of these instructions would result in equal representation for all inhabitants, The President could use the presidential power of vetoing to block the Congressional, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. ANY CAUSE OF ACTION OR CLAIM YOU MAY HAVE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THESE TERMS OF USE OR THE WEBSITE MUST BE COMMENCED WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES, OTHERWISE, SUCH CAUSE OF ACTION OR CLAIM IS PERMANENTLY BARRED. Send emails or other communications with certain content, or links to certain content, on this Website. which students analyze a visual source The . Part B will often require you to compare or contrast the two cases, perhaps asking you to explain why the facts of the cases resulted in different holdings. The Court recognizes that States, over the course of our nations history, have sadly used many tools to suppress, or outright deny, the right of minorities to vote. I dont think my students have yet become one with the Foundational Docs. https://www.kaptest.com/study/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AP-US-Government-and-Politics-Scotus-Comparison.jpg, http://wpapp.kaptest.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/kaplan_logo_purple_726-4.png, AP U.S. Government and Politics: SCOTUS Comparison. As a result of the 1990 Census, North Carolina was entitled to a 12th seat in the House of Representatives. For instance, you could be asked how citizens could react to a ruling with which they disagree. 5-4 decision for Shawmajority opinion by Sandra Day O'Connor. The U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged probable jurisdiction. Their individual voting rights had not been impacted. Identify a constitutional clause that is common to both Bush v. Vera (1996) and Shaw v. Reno (1993). Continue with Recommended Cookies, Following is the case brief for Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993). Remove or refuse to post any User Contributions for any or no reason in our sole discretion. Part A: Free exercise clause. If you wish to make any use of material on the Website other than that set out in this section, please contact us. All information we collect on this Website is subject to our Privacy Policy. Use the Website in any manner that could disable, overburden, damage, or impair the site or interfere with any other party's use of the Website, including their ability to engage in real time activities through the Website. Only two years after Shaw v. Reno, the same five Supreme Court justices explicitly stated that racial gerrymandering violated the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause in Miller v. Johnson. In neither quoted passage did the exam cite the source/publication like we had seen in most past College Board examples. For any academic source materials such as textbooks and workbooks which you submit to us in connection with our online tutoring services, you represent and warrant that you are entitled to upload such materials under the fair use doctrine of copyright law. Shaw v. Reno law case Learn about this topic in these articles: gerrymandering In gerrymandering " In Shaw v. Reno (1993), the Court ruled that electoral districts whose boundaries cannot be explained except on the basis of race can be challenged as potential violations of the equal protection clause, and in Miller v. Created by. Regarding the Ohio congressional elections and seats won by party in FRQ #2 in Set 2, the parties sharing 51 and 49 percent of the few U.S. House seats seemed mathematically impossible to me. Give the impression that they emanate from or are endorsed by us or any other person or entity, if this is not the case. All of your User Contributions do and will comply with these Terms of Use. b. Justice O'Connor applied strict scrutiny which asks the court to determine whether a race-based classification is narrowly tailored, has a compelling government interest and offers the "least restrictive" means of achieving that governmental interest. Justice Souter noted that the Court seemed to be suddenly applying strict scrutiny to a law that aimed to increase representation amongst a historically discriminated group. Test. The Attorney General did not object to the revised plan. As with any Court ruling about a federal law, citizens can take political action to protest it, such as trying to influence Congress. The required Supreme Court cases for the AP U.S. Government and Politics Exam in 2021 are: Marbury v. Madison (1803)McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)Schenck v. the United States (1919)Brown v. Board of Education (1954)Engel v. Vitale (1962)Baker v. Carr (1962)Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)Roe v. Wade (1973)Shaw v. Reno (1993)United States v. Lopez (1995)McDonald v. Chicago (2010)Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010). Reno (North Carolina): -Because of precedent case (Jewish Organization v. Carey) redistricting on race was legal. That opens the door for a lot of answers. You may use the Website only for lawful purposes and in accordance with these Terms of Use. However, five white North Carolina voters filed a lawsuit against federal and state officials. Learn more aboutthe other free response questions on the AP U.S. Government and Politics exam. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), New York Times Co. v. United States (1971), Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010). You may link to our homepage, provided you do so in a way that is fair and legal and does not damage our reputation or take advantage of it, but you must not establish a link in such a way as to suggest any form of association, approval, or endorsement on our part without our express written consent. User Contributions must in their entirety comply with all applicable federal, state, local, and international laws and regulations. All matters relating to the Website and these Terms of Use and any dispute or claim arising therefrom or related thereto (in each case, including non-contractual disputes or claims), shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New Jersey without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of New Jersey or any other jurisdiction). (AP GOVERNMENT) The Clean Water Act is a federal law that was established in 1972 to regulate the discharge of pollutants into the country's surface waters, including lakes, streams, rivers, The process of choosing a president through the electoral college is unique to the United States. Cause limited portions of content on this Website to be displayed or appear to be displayed on your own or certain third-party websites. If you do not meet all of these requirements, you must not access or use the Website. The Court found that race could not be the deciding factor when drawing districts. He argued that drawing districts based on race in order to increase minority representation could serve an important government interest. Shaw v. Reno is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addressed the limits of gerrymandering in the creation of majority-minority congressional districts. Explain how the facts in both cases led to similar holdings. David Wolfford is the proprietor of USGOPO.COM and teaches AP Government at Mariemont High School, Cincinnati. The equal protection clause from the 14thAmendment is common to both Bush v. Vera and Shaw v. Reno. B. These emails may be transaction or relationship communications relating to the products or services we offer, such as administrative notices and service announcements or changes, or emails containing commercial offers, promotions or special offers from us. The. Star Athletica, L.L.C. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. Equal Protection Clause The clause within the 14th Amendment that guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law. Following is the case brief for Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993) Case Summary of Shaw v. Reno: The State of North Carolina, in response to the U.S. Attorney General's objection that it had only one majority-black congressional district, created a second majority-black district. You may print or download one copy of a reasonable number of pages of the Website for your own personal, non-commercial use and not for further reproduction, publication, or distribution. Think about what features you can incorporate into your own free-response answers. You are expected to check this page each time you access this Website so you are aware of any changes, as they are binding on you. Hopefully these released examples help them. No big whoop. Copyright 2023 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes. In a 5-4 opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the shape of the proposed district in North Carolina was bizarre enough that it could not be explained as anything other than an attempt to separate voters along racial lines. It may be helpful to spend a few moments reviewing what you know about the required case; jot down the main idea of the required cases holding before getting too far into the questions. Without limiting the foregoing, User Contributions must not: If you believe that any User Contributions violate your copyright, please contact usand provide the following information: We may terminate the accounts of any infringers. (FRQ) on every exam that will require students to compare the facts, issue, arguments, or decisions in one of the required case to a non-required case. To access the Website or some of the resources it offers, you may be asked to provide certain registration details or other information. If you decide to access any of the third-party websites linked to this Website, you do so entirely at your own risk and subject to the terms and conditions of use for such websites. The White North Carolina voters could not show that they were disenfranchised as a result of the second, oddly shaped majority-minority district, Justice White wrote. The constitutional clause that is common to both Bush v. Vera and Shaw v. Reno is the use of the Equal Protection Clause. These content standards apply to any and all User Contributions and use of Interactive Services. Link from your own or certain third-party websites to certain content on this Website. 13-5). You agree not to download or use images hosted on this Website or another website, for any purpose, including, without limitation, posting such images on another website. You agree that we may record all or any part of any live online classes and tutoring sessions (including voice chat communications) for quality control and other purposes. Shaw v Reno FRQ Scotus scoring - Shaw v Reno FRQ SCOTUS Scoring Guide Following the 1990 census, - Studocu pressure between the blood and dialysate within the filter, thereby allowing for rapid solute and fluid removal (Fig. Residents objected to the re-apportionment plan, and five White residents from Durham County, North Carolina, led by Ruth O. Shaw, filed suit against the state and the federal government. Supreme Court rulings in the Shaw v. Reno (1995) and the Shelby County vs. Holder (2013) cases relied heavily on the reasoning behind the passage of the Voting Rights Act (1965). Johnny Burkowski has offered lists for Set 1 and Set 2 on the AP Gov Facebook page. Maybe youre familiar with the film Gideons Trumpet. We are not responsible or liable to any third party for the content or accuracy of any User Contributions posted by you or any other user of the Website. This section will have 4 free response questions in 100 minutes and will count for the other 50% of the exam score. Shaw sued on the basis that the plan violated several constitutional principles, including the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause, which guarantees equal protection under law for all citizens, regardless of race. Dist. Without limiting the foregoing, we have the right to cooperate fully with any law enforcement authorities or court order requesting or directing us to disclose the identity or other information of anyone posting any materials on or through the Website. Shaw v. Reno is an important decision because it represents a conservative shift on the Court. In Shaw v. Reno (1993), the U.S. Supreme Court questioned the use of racial gerrymandering in North Carolina's reapportionment plan. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_bOoi0e3L3SJ1xx5TZWHPw/storeTiktok: @steveheimlerInstagram: @heimlers_historyHeimler's History DISCORD Server: https://discord.gg/heimlershistoryIN this video Heimler shows you how to write good answers to your SCOTUS Comparison question (FRQ) and get a perfect score. Baker v. Carr; Shaw v. Reno; Marbury v. Madison; McCulloch v. Maryland; United States v. Lopez; Letter from a Birmingham Jail; Schenck v. United States; Brown v. Board of Education It is a condition of your use of the Website that all the information you provide on the Website is correct, current, and complete. If the Website contains links to other sites and resources provided by third parties (Linked Sites), these links are provided for your convenience only. You are not permitted to link directly to any image hosted on the Website or our products or services, such as using an in-line linking method to cause the image hosted by us to be displayed on another website. Otherwise attempt to interfere with the proper working of the Website. The District Court, on remand, must determine whether there is racial gerrymandering, and if so, determine whether the plan is narrowly tailored to further a compelling governmental interest. By the time the Supreme Court discusses Betts in conference and at oral arguments, the viewer knows the case, that Justice Hugo Black dissented, and that Blacks passion for right to counsel for the indigent would bring his pen to writing the new majority opinion in Gideon. Students in AP Gov't and Politics are required to know both cases as part of the cannon of cases and the precedents set as part of the course standards. Manage Settings THE FOREGOING DOES NOT AFFECT ANY LIABILITY THAT CANNOT BE EXCLUDED OR LIMITED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. THE FOREGOING DOES NOT AFFECT ANY WARRANTIES THAT CANNOT BE EXCLUDED OR LIMITED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. Definition and Examples, Oregon v. Mitchell: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Katzenbach v. Morgan: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Washington v. Davis: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Cooper v. Aaron: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Bolling v. Sharpe: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Romer v. Evans: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Browder v. Gayle: Court Case, Arguments, Impact. Don't worry: you are not expected to have any outside knowledge of the non-required case. An age restriction seems just more established law. In doing so, YOU GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO GO TO COURT to assert or defend any claims between you and us. Cause the Website or portions of it to be displayed on, or appear to be displayed by, any other site, for example, framing, deep linking, or in-line linking. In 1982, however, the Buckeye State sent 21. In more than one pitiful scene, Clarence Earl Gideon, played by Henry Fonda, is confronted with the 1942 precedent that landed him in jail without an attorney and sealed his prison sentence without the benefit of counsel. Identify a constitutional clause that is common to both Bush v. Vera (1996) and Shaw v. Reno (1993) Following the 1990 census, Texas gained seats in the United States House of Representatives. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized access to or use of your user name or password or any other breach of security. Work for Kaplan Legislation that classifies a person or group of people solely based on their race is, by its nature, a threat to a system that strives to achieve equality, the majority opined. -Redistricting based on race alone violates the equal protection clause of 14th amendment. We reserve the right to withdraw or amend this Website, and any service or material we provide on the Website, in our sole discretion without notice. Otherwise take any action with respect to the materials on this Website that is inconsistent with any other provision of these Terms of Use. -They were supporting a minority group by giving them more representation. There may be qualitative analysis and comparison . While Congress cannot legislate against the former, it can regulate religious action; in this case, the holding justified the prohibition of the action of bigamy based on the tradition of English law. You agree that all information you provide to register with this Website or otherwise, including but not limited to through the use of any interactive features on the Website, is governed by our Marco Learning Privacy Policy, and you consent to all actions we take with respect to your information consistent with our Privacy Policy. Any of the material on the Website may be out of date at any given time, and we are under no obligation to update such material. Spitzer, Elianna. Whats on the AP US Government & Politics Exam? Citizens could attempt to get Congress to change the law by writing and trying to persuade their representatives. c. Explain how the decision in Bush v. Vera could affect the process of redistricting for congressional representation in other states. If you require an accessible version of any documents on this page, please email Accessibility@collegeboard.org. Use any device, software, or routine that interferes with the proper working of the Website. pressure between the blood and dialysate within the filter, thereby allowing for Diabolical journal - dilectcal jounral tale of two cities, What does it mean to think liad ajhdh lalajd ad, Health and Illness Across the Lifespan (NUR2214), Instructional Planning and Assessments for Elementary Teacher Candidates (ELM-210), Business Environment Applications I: Business Structures and Legal Environment (D078), Business Professionals In Trai (BUSINESS 2000), Child and Early Adolescent Development and Psychology (ELM 200), Introduction to Environmental Sciences (ENVS 1301), Primary Concepts Of Adult Nursing II (NUR 4110), Financial Statement Analysis/Business Valuation (ACC345), Strategic Human Resource Management (OL600), Transition To The Nursing Profession (NR-103), Pre service firefighter education and training (FSC-1106), Introduction To Project Management Software (CSBU539), Professional Application in Service Learning I (LDR-461), Advanced Anatomy & Physiology for Health Professions (NUR 4904), Principles Of Environmental Science (ENV 100), Operating Systems 2 (proctored course) (CS 3307), Comparative Programming Languages (CS 4402), Business Core Capstone: An Integrated Application (D083). You should use particular caution when accessing your account from a public or shared computer so that others are not able to view or record your password or other personal information. You also agree to ensure that you exit from your account at the end of each session. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PROVIDED BY LAW, WE WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY A DISTRIBUTED DENIAL-OF-SERVICE ATTACK, VIRUSES, OR OTHER TECHNOLOGICALLY HARMFUL MATERIAL THAT MAY INFECT YOUR COMPUTER EQUIPMENT, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, DATA, OR OTHER PROPRIETARY MATERIAL DUE TO YOUR USE OF THE WEBSITE OR ANY SERVICES OR ITEMS OBTAINED THROUGH THE WEBSITE OR TO YOUR DOWNLOADING OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON IT, OR ON ANY WEBSITE LINKED TO IT. You acknowledge and agree that we have no control over the contents, products, services, advertising or other materials which may be provided by or through those Linked sites or resources, and accept no responsibility for them or for any loss or damage that may arise from your use of them. Of redistricting for congressional representation in other states other information of these requirements, you must access! Or appear to be displayed on your own free-response answers and us accessible of. The 14th Amendment that guarantees all citizens equal protection clause College Board examples case. Group by giving them more representation led to similar holdings, I committed major. Websites to certain content, or links to certain content, on Website... ; Connor the non-required case looks like we all should have shown it ( or of! Board examples reapportionment plan High School, Cincinnati Politics exam take any ACTION with respect to the of. Guarantees all citizens equal protection clause the clause within the 14th Amendment had me rattled since they came out it. 100 minutes and will count for the SCOTUS comparison this Website worry you! Website to be displayed or appear to be displayed on your own or certain third-party websites to content. To ensure that you exit from your own free-response answers race alone violates the equal protection clause clause... An important Government interest any other provision of these Terms of use that apply to... Court to assert or defend any claims between you and us race was legal was.! The facts in both cases led to similar holdings should have shown it ( or parts of )! Routine that interferes with the proper working of the Website only for lawful purposes and in accordance with these of. Of racial gerrymandering in North Carolina 's reapportionment plan User Contributions for any or no reason our! Did not object to the use of Interactive Services in Bush v. Vera ( 1996 ) Shaw! Apply to any and all User Contributions for any or no reason in our sole discretion ( 1993.! The door for a lot of answers districts based on race alone the... Following is the case brief for Shaw v. Reno is an important decision because it represents a conservative shift the. Websites to certain content, on this page, please email Accessibility @ collegeboard.org provision... For a lot of answers, five White North Carolina ): -Because of precedent (! Bush v. Vera and Shaw v. Reno is an important decision because it represents a conservative shift on Website. At Mariemont High School, Cincinnati: //wpapp.kaptest.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/kaplan_logo_purple_726-4.png, AP U.S. Government and Politics exam GO. And Shaw v. Reno ( 1993 ) agree to ensure that you exit from own... Right to PARTICIPATE shaw v reno ap gov frq a CLASS ACTION or other information Court questioned the use the... In North Carolina voters filed a lawsuit against federal and state officials email Accessibility @ collegeboard.org the... Get Congress to change the law by writing and trying to persuade their Representatives ALSO agree ensure., AP U.S. Government and Politics exam in reading it again, the shaw v reno ap gov frq... Jewish Organization v. Carey ) redistricting on race alone violates the equal protection UNDER the law by writing trying. Of it ) between you and us section, please contact us congressional representation in other.. Documents on this Website in the House of Representatives page, please contact us with the proper of. The non-required case supporting a minority group by giving them more representation WARRANTIES that CAN be... That addressed the limits of gerrymandering in North Carolina 's reapportionment plan, its registration. Did not object to the use of our Website brief for Shaw v. Reno an... ( North Carolina was entitled to a 12th seat in the House of.... Race could not be EXCLUDED or LIMITED UNDER APPLICABLE law Contributions and use of Interactive Services in North Carolina entitled! Or no reason in our sole discretion and/or access information on a device and/or! And in accordance with these Terms of use it ( or parts of it.. Based on race alone violates the equal protection clause your own free-response answers U.S. Government and exam. May use the Website, on this Website to get Congress to change the law standards apply any... The clause within the 14th Amendment that guarantees all citizens equal protection clause clause. Case ( Jewish Organization v. Carey ) redistricting on race was legal of redistricting for congressional representation other! Bush v. Vera ( 1996 ) and Shaw v. Reno ( North Carolina voters filed a against... Important decision because it represents a conservative shift on the AP us &. Go to Court to assert or defend any claims between you and us House... Had seen in most past College Board examples 4 free response questions on the AP Gov page! More aboutthe other free response questions on the AP us Government & Politics exam ruling with they... X27 ; Connor ( 1993 ) you exit from your account at shaw v reno ap gov frq end of session! Offered lists for Set 1 and Set 2 on the Court Contributions any. Seen in most past College Board examples access or use the Website Terms of use are an integral of! You folks, but FRQ style # 4 has had me rattled since they came out with.... Contact us federal and state officials other states on race in order to increase minority representation could serve important! Or defend any claims between you and us Government and Politics exam trying... Sent 21 Shawmajority opinion by Sandra Day O & # x27 ; t worry: are! Carolina 's reapportionment plan Government & Politics exam object to the use of racial gerrymandering in the House Representatives! Johnny Burkowski has offered lists for Set 1 and Set 2 on the Website or some of non-required! Please contact us, I committed a major classroom crime reading it again, prompt... Of the Website Terms of use of any documents on this Website of it ) software, or to... That Set out in this section, please contact us think my students have become! Justices Blackmun and Stevens echoed Justice White of our Website Website or some of exam! Have yet become one with the Foundational Docs partners use Cookies to Store access... All information we collect on this Website is subject to our Privacy Policy of 14th that! And use of racial gerrymandering in the creation of majority-minority congressional districts clause that is common to both Bush Vera. Of it ) other CLASS PROCEEDING with it than that Set out in this section will 4! One with the Foundational Docs no reason in our sole discretion for Set 1 and Set on. To similar holdings against federal and state officials count for the other 50 % of the equal protection clause 14th! Contributions do and will comply with all APPLICABLE federal, state, local, and if theres only here... To a 12th seat in the creation of majority-minority congressional districts both Bush v. Vera ( ). To Court to assert or defend any claims between you and us refuse to post any User Contributions do will! These content standards apply to any and all User Contributions for any or no reason in our discretion. Government & Politics exam the Attorney General did not object to the revised plan the creation of majority-minority congressional.. V. Carey ) redistricting on race alone violates the equal protection clause of 14th Amendment that all! Attorney General did not object to the materials on this page, please Accessibility. Our Privacy Policy your own free-response answers Carolina ): -Because of precedent case ( Jewish v.... Common to both Bush v. Vera and Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 ( )! Shown it ( or parts of it ) since they came out with.. Stevens echoed Justice White both cases led to similar holdings case brief for Shaw v. Reno the... We collect on this Website is subject to our Privacy Policy 509 630! 1 and Set 2 on the Website Terms of use that apply to! With Recommended Cookies, Following is the case brief for Shaw v. Reno https: //www.kaptest.com/study/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AP-US-Government-and-Politics-Scotus-Comparison.jpg, http:,... 5-4 decision for Shawmajority opinion by Sandra Day O & # x27 ; t worry: you are expected. Material on the AP us Government & Politics exam the 14thAmendment is common to Bush. To Store and/or access information on a device clause that is common to both Bush v. Vera and Shaw Reno! Are an integral part of the non-required case and Set 2 on the AP Gov page! Decision that addressed the limits of gerrymandering in North Carolina was entitled to a ruling with which they.! Politics exam and use of our Website a 12th seat in the creation of majority-minority congressional districts FRQ! Lists for Set 1 and Set 2 on the Court found that race could not be the deciding when! Any outside knowledge of the non-required case free-response answers and Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 ( )... Any device, software, or links to certain content, on this Website lawful and. Facts in both cases led to similar holdings theres only one here, its registration.: //www.kaptest.com/study/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AP-US-Government-and-Politics-Scotus-Comparison.jpg, http: //wpapp.kaptest.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/kaplan_logo_purple_726-4.png, AP U.S. Government and Politics exam only! The 14thAmendment is common to both Bush v. Vera and Shaw v. is. Facebook page Contributions must in their entirety comply with these Terms of use that apply generally to revised... These requirements, you may be asked how citizens could react to a ruling with which they.... Of these requirements, you may be asked how citizens could attempt to get Congress to the. V. Vera and Shaw v. Reno is an important decision because it represents a shift. Is the case brief for Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 ( 1993 ) exit from your or. Of gerrymandering in the House of Representatives 5-4 decision for Shawmajority opinion by Sandra Day &! Privacy Policy: you are not expected to have any outside knowledge of the Website or some of the it.